[quote=“TheFlame52, post:644, topic:2160”]EQUALITY FOR EUROPEAN WEAPONS
My point here is that there are really only a few medieval European weapons: rapier, broadsword, zweihander, mace, morningstar, awl pike, and spear. There were so many more than that, like the long rapier or the short sword or the sword breaker or the sabre. And the diamond weapons are even more racist. Whya are there only three of them? What makes a katana so special? What about a diamond broadsword or a diamond rapier?[/quote]
long rapier: It’s still just called a ‘rapier’, which we already have.
short sword: This isn’t a particular sword, it’s a description of a sword. Perhaps you mean something like a gladius, spatha, hanger, or baselard (some of those are actually classified as knives).
sword breaker: This term refers to either a specialized knife used to defend against swords, or a design feature of dueling blades.
sabre: We already have these.
I’m not sure where you’re seeing a lack of ‘equality’ here. We’ve got about eight or nine medieval European weapons and three or four medieval Japanese weapons. If anything you should be demanding more Asian weapons to balance out all the European ones.