[quote=“trusty_patches, post:1500, topic:3101”]>that redtext
I didn’t know “pimp” is a male-only profession all of a sudden. I mean, there are probably a special word for female counterpart in English(matron?) that I don’t know, but I did not imply in any way that this is gender-locked.[/quote]
“Madam”, maybe? I don’t disagree, though - it’s no more ruled out than female butlers and male maids.
Make the Rock-It Launcher from the fallout series and I will bend in your presence.
Sock Puppet Gun.
“Those NPCs won’t suspect a thing!”
[quote=“trusty_patches, post:1500, topic:3101”]>that redtext
I didn’t know “pimp” is a male-only profession all of a sudden. I mean, there are probably a special word for female counterpart in English(matron?) that I don’t know, but I did not imply in any way that this is gender-locked.[/quote]
I vote Pimpette be added to the dictionary to specifically refer to those pimps of the female gender.
[quote=“SeigeLion, post:1504, topic:3101”][quote=“trusty_patches, post:1500, topic:3101”]>that redtext
I didn’t know “pimp” is a male-only profession all of a sudden. I mean, there are probably a special word for female counterpart in English(matron?) that I don’t know, but I did not imply in any way that this is gender-locked.[/quote]
I vote Pimpette be added to the dictionary to specifically refer to those pimps of the female gender.[/quote]
Would that make Pimpet the term for pimps of the male gender, a la brunette and brunet?
[quote=“trusty_patches, post:1500, topic:3101”]>that redtext
I didn’t know “pimp” is a male-only profession all of a sudden. I mean, there are probably a special word for female counterpart in English(matron?) that I don’t know, but I did not imply in any way that this is gender-locked.[/quote]
It’s typically considered male, but that’s because of a part that drew the redtext and that I redacted from your post: that the workers must (for some reason) be female. That was the problem.
I don’t personally have much respect for the profession–leeching off of others seems pretty dishonorable IMO–but there’s nothing preventing women from practicing it.
I always thought they were hustlers?
[quote=“KA101, post:1506, topic:3101”][quote=“trusty_patches, post:1500, topic:3101”]>that redtext
I didn’t know “pimp” is a male-only profession all of a sudden. I mean, there are probably a special word for female counterpart in English(matron?) that I don’t know, but I did not imply in any way that this is gender-locked.[/quote]
It’s typically considered male, but that’s because of a part that drew the redtext and that I redacted from your post: that the workers must (for some reason) be female. That was the problem.
I don’t personally have much respect for the profession–leeching off of others seems pretty dishonorable IMO–but there’s nothing preventing women from practicing it.[/quote]
“Hoe” isn’t a female-specific word too, you know. It just means “whore”, and this word is pretty much universal.
Well, unless you insist on using “manwhore” for male counterparts, but that would be insulting because I doubt we can put such a glorious character in the game.
If you’re driving on a road and there’s a deer, it will just sit there and stare at you until you either hit it or swerve out of the way.
[quote=“trusty_patches, post:1508, topic:3101”][quote=“KA101, post:1506, topic:3101”][quote=“trusty_patches, post:1500, topic:3101”]>that redtext
I didn’t know “pimp” is a male-only profession all of a sudden. I mean, there are probably a special word for female counterpart in English(matron?) that I don’t know, but I did not imply in any way that this is gender-locked.[/quote]
It’s typically considered male, but that’s because of a part that drew the redtext and that I redacted from your post: that the workers must (for some reason) be female. That was the problem.
I don’t personally have much respect for the profession–leeching off of others seems pretty dishonorable IMO–but there’s nothing preventing women from practicing it.[/quote]
“Hoe” isn’t a female-specific word too, you know. It just means “whore”, and this word is pretty much universal.
Well, unless you insist on using “manwhore” for male counterparts, but that would be insulting because I doubt we can put such a glorious character in the game.
[/quote]
Hardly; as I said, your post originally required that the workers be female. I redacted that and redtexted accordingly.
It did not. It said, straight in and out, “2d6 hoes(as in friendly NPCs)” from the very beginning to evade such bullshit with “b-but muh gender-lock”. I typed it in myself and I am not that much of a demented fuck yet to think it was something else.
It did not. It said, straight in and out, “2d6 hoes(as in friendly NPCs)” from the very beginning to evade such bullshit with “b-but muh gender-lock”. I typed it in myself and I am not that much of a demented fuck yet to think it was something else.[/quote]
I’ll disagree with that, but we’ve already established that disagreement.
Actually, in your original post it was more like
Then KA101 edited out “female” and added a redtext.
Unless he placed it in your post without adding that “last edited by” footnote, waited for everyone to see it and then removed it later, you must have typed it.
Oooh, a new trait, you have a phobia of a random consonant then vowel string and take morale damage every time that it appears in a game message. If you get “qo” then you shouldn’t notice it, but if you end up with “as” then maybe there will be some issues…
NI!
NI![/quote]
WRONG. We are no longer the knights that say ni we are now the knights that icky icky wooop ping!
Can’t.
Ummm, did the Python reference break KA101?
You know, rabbits really ought to have a more significant role…
Some of those survivor’s notes should ended in elegantly-penned gurgling screams…
Some N.P.C.s should just hurl an endless string of insults, and perhaps the occasional wooden horse, at you for no apparent reason.
Rideable animals seem like too much effort to implement, but you should get the same combat and morale bonuses from coconut shells.
If you can convince an N.P.C. that they are lighter than a duck, they should burn themselves.
N.P.C.s should have more strenuously-voiced political views.
Sword-fights really ought to result in more dismemberment, but it really shouldn’t be as debilitating.
You should have missions to rescue N.P.C.s from other N.P.C.s. The hostility of either party should be largely random, though the mission will not be completed until the imprisoning N.P.C.s are convincingly and violently defeated.
1 Like
Brass Allergy
AAAACHOO! Bullets (or rather, their casings) cause you to sneeze. Rather violently too.
Advanced Brass Allergy
OH NO! Your sneezes make bullets go off. This can’t possibly be used to your advantage, can it?
Ummm, did the Python reference break KA101?
You know, rabbits really ought to have a more significant role…
Some of those survivor’s notes should ended in elegantly-penned gurgling screams…
Some N.P.C.s should just hurl an endless string of insults, and perhaps the occasional wooden horse, at you for no apparent reason.
Rideable animals seem like too much effort to implement, but you should get the same combat and morale bonuses from coconut shells.
If you can convince an N.P.C. that they are lighter than a duck, they should burn themselves.
N.P.C.s should have more strenuously-voiced political views.
Sword-fights really ought to result in more dismemberment, but it really shouldn’t be as debilitating.
You should have missions to rescue N.P.C.s from other N.P.C.s. The hostility of either party should be largely random, though the mission will not be completed until the imprisoning N.P.C.s are convincingly and violently defeated.[/quote]
Nah, I was making a reference too.