[quote=“RAM, post:2643, topic:5570”]A robot servicing station might be nice. But really, most technology is built to other specifications, if these robots are built to function independently for long periods of time, which seams reasonable considering that they don’t need to eat or sleep and have high radiation and chemical tolerances, and also seems plausible considering that they really aren’t all that effective compared to conventional military forces, then, if their specifications are high enough, they could actually remain operational for very long periods of time. You could have redundancies, automated part-replacement systems, self-sealing panels, self-cleaning high-tolerance filters and most parts designed to operate without much filtration. Sure, the odd broken-down robot would be realistic, and maybe the odd otherwise-functional robot that is stuck in a situation that its programming can’t handle but just needs some high-priority stimuli…
They would just break down, and suffer from attrition, but I could see robots still up and about a couple of decades down the line…[/quote]
Indeed. Once the backup generator fails, a service station wouldn’t be able to recharge an entire fleet of bots. It could charge them slowly with solar power, but the main failure rate would be due to mechanical failure-- and attrition as you’ve said. Military turrets shooting anything that moves, zombies grabbing and damaging them…
Even if the service station can repair stuff, eventually it would simply run out of spare parts, or find things that simply couldn’t be repaired then and there.