[quote=“KroganElite, post:5718, topic:42”][quote=“blazing glory, post:5717, topic:42”][quote=“Valpo, post:5716, topic:42”][quote=“blazing glory, post:5715, topic:42”]Alright.
…Can’t tell if that’s good or bad, probably bad because leg coverage means encumberment for the legs and faster damage to it.[/quote]
No its for itsel not bad. At least not for a normal duster ; reasons:
It has encumbrance of 0 and ist the upper layer of your clothing thus it does not interfere with most other parts worn there (theres one piece of armor made of leather specificly designed for your legs that would though — thus if you wanna wear that id recommend using a trenchcoat instead.) resulting in no added encumbrance at all.
So most of the time you get extra protection and warmth for your legs while adding 0 encumbrance. Leather variant should add 1 i think.
Only time this might be a hindrance is when its to hot (though your torso is usualy the hottest part anyway ) or as mentioned above when wearing something else that would cover the upper layer of you legs (which is rare afaik)[/quote]
Ah, I’m still kinda inexperienced when it comes to encumberment on layers.[/quote]
It’s pretty simple. Each body part has 4 layers: inner(close to skin), normal clothing, belted(strapped on to you), and outer(worn over). If you have two in any one bodypart-layer it will add one encumberance. In the layering screen the first number is the sum encumberance of the number shown on each clothing per body part. The second number is the stacking penalty for having multiple clothing in each bodypart-layer. There are exception i’ve found where some items don’t count for stacking penalties.[/quote]
Yeah I know about encumberance and stacking penalties, I just thought that, minus exceptions like shirts, having more then two items on any bodypart causes stacking penalty.