There’s enough wolves trying to eat you every morning if you camp in the woods that it rots before you ca eat it all. So although more variety of animals would be good, more animals would not.
personally i agree that adding more animals would probably be more of a pain for players rate of survivaly but i would prefer it no other way, the harder the better, also it is kind of hard to believe surviving off of rabbits and squirrels alone, even the occasional deer, however constantly trying to kill packs of wolves everytime you get attacked by them can be pretty difficult when starting out. and a wider variety of non hostile animals will add a better economic system then relying on scraps within the cities, also means more trade, and can also provide reasons as to why the said wolves are not weak from starvation having to rely on people as food, or trying to catch the squirrels or rabbits.
and another reason to add more animals, or hostiles will be to vary them up, i get pretty bored when i know how to evade and kill every creature because there as so little.
I think the wolves being in makes sense. The wolves are used to dealing with zombies, which are universally hostile. Also, wolves would spread out again once society falls.