[quote=“AerialK7, post:17, topic:1056”]Blegh, why else would people play games?._. if i wanted to handle power tools id walk out into the shed. No, I want FUN, if youve ever heard of it, even if it is is at the expense of ‘realism’
Thats what I dont get about this game industry, everythings about making the games more ‘realistic’. But the reason people play games is to have fun and to do what they cant in life. Thats why I applaud games like FC: Blood Dragon /Rantover[/quote]
Imagine I’m reading a book. It’s a thriller based around a team of crack scientists trying to contain and find a cure for a virus on the loose. After a page of technobable detailing its composition and genetic history, it follows with the line that says “bats are bugs”. You and I know this isn’t true. The story seems to be set pretty close to reality. It’s not discworld, or something that happened on another planet, it’s roughly present day.
Suppose as a friend and doing a friend’s duty, I call up Clarice and tell her after reading her manuscript “you know, bats aren’t bugs”. After this, imagine she replies to me that because this is a work of fiction it’s solely about how much people are entertained.
At this point I get worried, and I say ‘Clarice! You don’t have to just leave it in there like that, all you need to do is to change bat into some other sort of animal that’s a bug, simply change the claim into “bats are mammals”, or simply leave it out and find another explanation to fill out that mechanism required in the story’.
There would be no loss of any entertainment value or fun if any of these three options are taken. All that would be avoided would be bad writing, or a poorly thought out idea.
Realism and fun are not mutually exclusive. It takes a great deal of skill to weave these two together into a believable setting. Making stuff up that’s hard to believe or comprehend is something anyone can do.
So drills were a stupid idea. What about an industrial wood chipper?