[quote=“Logrin, post:1, topic:7139”]Just figured they could use some wide market appeal,
Automated Subvocalization Eliminator - A discreet pair of lenses that stow away when not in use this CBM assist the reader with an intuitive and feature rich overlay marketed for speed readers. With freeform parsing and highlighted text even the most remedial of readers is sure to show improvement.
Effect: Decreases read times by a certain percent. Since it’s percent based smart readers will show more improvement over their low INT counterparts. Causes slight pain and unhappiness with prolonged use.[/quote]
Game effect seems sound to me, but how is any kind of interface supposed to eliminate subvocalization, and how is this in any way a good thing? Reading without subvocalization is known as “skimming” and is pretty much useless for learning anything in detail.
EDIT: Huh, after looking into it, apparently there IS a big speedreading subculture convinced that subvocalisation produces unnecessary cognitive burden. Don’t believe it. There’s no science to support it, and it’s based on flawed reasoning. Subvocalization is a manifestation of your brain’s linguistic processing at work. Eliminating an important step in processing what you’re reading might let you work through a text faster, but it’ll murder your retention of the text, so what’s the point?