[quote=“MarkJerue, post:12, topic:12294”]Vegetarians are prevalent in India, have been prevalent for millennia, and are not dying in massive numbers.
Example from Wikipedia on India:
According to the 2006 Hindu-CNN-IBN State of the Nation Survey, 31% of Indians are ‘vegetarian’, while another 9% also consume eggs (ovo-vegetarian). Among the various communities, vegetarianism was most common among the Lingayat, Vaishnav Community, Jain community and then Brahmins at 55%, and less frequent among Muslims (3%) and residents of coastal states. Other surveys cited by FAO and USDA estimate 40% of the Indian population as being vegetarian. These surveys indicate that even Indians who do eat meat, do so infrequently, with less than 30% consuming it regularly, although the reasons are mainly cultural. In states where vegetarianism is more common, milk consumption is higher and is associated with lactase persistence. This allows people to continue consuming milk into adulthood and obtain proteins that are substituted for meat, fish and eggs in other areas. An official survey conducted by Government of India, with a sample size of 8858 and the census frame as 2011, indicated India’s vegetarian population to be 28-29% of the total population. Compared to a similar survey done almost a decade earlier, India’s vegetarian population has increased.[/quote]
I didn’t think milk counted as vegetarian - that would help considerably, if people are including that. The nutrition in milk of all kinds if quite good.
That said, you’re not arguing that historic vegetarian diet would fit the modern definition of “healthy”, only that it’s possible to live on it (which I explicitly agreed with).