[quote=“Jarlaxle, post:12, topic:7454”][quote=“Barhandar, post:11, topic:7454”][quote=“KA101, post:10, topic:7454”]KA101 looks at the front page, then back at the forum, then over at the wiki
And that is an accurate assessment of our site, I’d say. IMO it’s easy to navigate and easy on the browser/bandwidth. Both of those are assets in my estimation.[/quote]
What it needs for popularity, though, is wiki that is updated at least to latest stable - or huge red text ‘WIKI IS TERRIBLY OUTDATED AND NOBODY IS UPDATING IT, PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK’ on its main page.[/quote]
Gonna jump in someone should put a warning on the wiki main page. It would be a 7 day a week job updating the wiki for this game. So much is added, fixed, etc. that no way someone could keep up with it. This is not a bad thing. It’s awesome how much work goes into this game.[/quote]
4 AM here, just merged yet more stuff and got roped into an IRC discussion on feasibility of quest-based system for getting power up post-Cataclysm. Wiki would be a full-time job for a While just to catch up, and once that’s done you’re still looking at a few hours per day keeping up.
So yeah.