XD
You forgot the rest of the critics.
"Page 271 is overrated, the hype will die down soon" - IGN 3/10.
"I give Page 271 a four for not being German enough" -German Olympics Judge 4/10.
"Well It didn't mess up anything TOO badly, Ive not seen 272-300 but I give it a nine so it won't feel bad." -Gymnastics Judge 9/10
“There wasn’t enough learning, I was too busy chatting with my friend to pay attention and got lost and confused with the story-line, there were to many explosions and it left me feeling anxious” -Every Movie Critic Ever 2/10.
Metacritic score of 39 and rotten tomato score of 47, but what do they know.
out of? 100? Yeah I wouldn’t trust their scores either. Never trust a movie critic. Or any paid critic for that matter. They take themselves and their job WAY to seriously and it takes the meaning out of their job, and themselves.
Its basic elitism syndrome. It happens to politicians,police, soldiers, ect. But it is silly how critics see them self as a valuable societal “need”.
XD. Yep. society will come grinding to a halt if people don’t know ahead of time what Billy Joe thinks of the movie before they see it.
suppresses urge to make politically charged comment on political demographic group and their (useless) outlooks on life in general
You can apply this to any group depending on your point view and to humanity itself to a point.
True. Our ability to be total hypocrites is possibly only exceeded to our ability to adapt… often to things we have no good reason to adapt to/around.
like chemicals and shit, why do we need those? why do we put those in food? the population of the human race (in general) sure does love to kill themselves like fucking idiots.
like chemicals and shit, why do we need those? why do we put those in food? the population of the human race (in general) sure does love to kill themselves like fucking idiots.[/quote]
It simplifies the process to the manufactures to make things cheaper and quicker at the expense of the consumer.
And makes it easier to keep the product from rotting before you even get it to market. =more $$$ for manufacturer’s. Oh wait not enough drawing here… Ima have to scribble something up.
Ahh, good. I look forward to it :>
Also, here’s me gabbing a bit on the “chemical additives” discussion mentioned earlier.
[spoiler]It is worth noting, that more money for the manufacturers can constitute other things depending on the situation. For instance, one can interpret it as a “higher price margin per amount of demand.”
This can essentially be looked at as an improvement of relative product quality, using relatively lower quantities of resources.
I also figure that the “adding of chemicals is terrible” argument is a rather uneducated one: artificial or otherwise well-processed chemicals aren’t necessarily good or bad. The same goes with “natural” agents. One instance lies in preservatives, which while not all may be the best for us, there’s a good amount that’s not particularly unhealthy, and helps reduce waste and make the food healthier in the sense that there is a much larger window in which you can eat it and not have it laced with mold, parasites, or what have you.
There is also the case where vitamins and minerals are manually added into cereal, for instance, which is why they are staple breakfast foods. Getting enough of those vitamins can prevent deficiencies and malnourishment.[/spoiler]
we’ve just been hit with logic
(no chemical is entirely deadly in small quantities. They put some measure of fluoride in the water system that makes it to your tap, brushes your teeth without brushing your teeth. But not cyanide, don’t eat cyanide, that’s a bad.)
THE DERAIL MERGED WITH THE TOPIC
IT’S OVER
I can agree that the derail is quite the cataclysm, ergo drawings about it belong in this thread.
1 Like
[quote=“StopSignal, post:4057, topic:441”]THE DERAIL MERGED WITH THE TOPIC
IT’S OVER[/quote]
Give in to the derailed train!
