# Can't stash PF9 magazine in ankle pouch

**URL:** <https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/cant-stash-pf9-magazine-in-ankle-pouch/23154>\
**Category:** The Garage\
**Created:** [April 6, 2020, 11:01am UTC](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/cant-stash-pf9-magazine-in-ankle-pouch/23154 "2020-04-06T11:01:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Invalid\_Username](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/4bbf92/32.png) [@Invalid\_Username](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/u/Invalid_Username)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2020, 11:01am UTC](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/cant-stash-pf9-magazine-in-ankle-pouch/23154/1 "2020-04-06T11:01:38Z")

</div>

Looking at the entries in 9mm.json, I see no discernable difference between the M9 magazine and the Kel-Tec PF9 magazine besides weight, volume and capacity. They both possess the MAG\_COMPACT tag that the ankle ammo pouch looks for, yet I can use an ankle pouch to stash one but not the other. The list of clothing in which a magazine may be stashed doesn’t even show up for the PF9 mag and I don’t understand why.

 ![mags](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/cataclysmdda/original/2X/8/80e87c2e724d0355d3fd321e9c312b45563eb854.png)

Is the PF9 magazine too small for the ankle pouch? Looking at my Ruger LCP, I notice that its magazine also cannot be stored in the ankle pouch, and it also has no “can be stored in” entries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mantar](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.cataclysmdda.org/mantar/32/42_2.png) [@Mantar](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/u/Mantar)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2020, 6:11pm UTC](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/cant-stash-pf9-magazine-in-ankle-pouch/23154/2 "2020-04-06T18:11:18Z")

</div>

The hardcoded pouch storage system is weird. It might go away in the near future, though, with the containter rewrite.