# Am I missing smth on the blatant drop-get exploit?

**URL:** https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/am-i-missing-smth-on-the-blatant-drop-get-exploit/13231
**Category:** The Garage
**Created:** [January 1, 2017, 8:10am UTC](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/am-i-missing-smth-on-the-blatant-drop-get-exploit/13231 "2017-01-01T08:10:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Nibelung44](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.cataclysmdda.org/nibelung44/32/587_2.png) [@Nibelung44](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/u/Nibelung44)
#### Post date: [January 1, 2017, 8:10am UTC](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/am-i-missing-smth-on-the-blatant-drop-get-exploit/13231/1 "2017-01-01T08:10:36Z")

</div>

Hi,

It is pretty obvious that dropping then getting an item is much less action-costly than putting it back into your inventory. That or I’m missing something super-obvious!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Weyrling](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/7bcc69/32.png) [@Weyrling](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/u/Weyrling)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2017, 12:59am UTC](https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/am-i-missing-smth-on-the-blatant-drop-get-exploit/13231/2 "2017-01-02T00:59:11Z")

</div>

It might use the wielding cost to unwield it instead of the ‘put thing into inventory’ cost, probably just an oversight.